News

As Americans, we look forward to celebrating the Fourth of July with fireworks, barbecues, and gatherings that honor our nation's independence. However, this festive day also brings an increase in certain dangers that can turn joyous occasions into tragedies. While fireworks are a traditional part of the celebration, the combination of alcohol, firearms, and large crowds creates a heightened risk for accidents and violence.

First responders are often inundated with emergency calls on July 4 and 5. Police departments report a surge in calls related to domestic disturbances, assaults, and shootings. Fire departments are stretched thin responding to firework-related fires. Emergency medical services are on high alert for injuries ranging from minor burns and cuts to life-threatening gunshot wounds and traumatic injuries from fireworks.

The Gun Violence Archive reports that July 4 is consistently the most dangerous day of the year in terms of gun violence. Since 2014, there have been 58 mass shootings on July 4, where a mass shooting is defined as a shooting resulting in four or more people being injured or killed. This alarming statistic underscores the heightened risk associated with this holiday. Firearms, often combined with alcohol consumption, significantly increase the likelihood of accidental discharges and intentional violence.

In 2023, for example, a six-year-old child was struck by a stray bullet that fell from the sky during Fourth of July celebrations in Southern Los Angeles. That same year, six individuals in an open-air coliseum in San Francisco were hit by stray celebratory gunfire, with some rounds reportedly coming from high-powered rifles. These incidents are stark reminders of the unpredictable and dangerous nature of celebratory gunfire.

Given these risks, wearing a bulletproof vest during Fourth of July festivities can be a prudent measure for personal safety, at least from stray bullets. A Level IIIA bulletproof vest, designed to stop pistol rounds up to .44 magnum, provides an added layer of protection against lower-velocity falling bullets, which are not uncommon during these celebrations. While this might seem like an extreme precaution to some, the data clearly supports the need for enhanced safety measures.

More than the risks posed by firearms, fireworks themselves are a significant hazard. In 2023, around 9,700 people were treated for firework-related injuries, with eight fatalities reported. Fireworks can cause severe burns, lacerations, and even loss of limbs. Moreover, they are a common cause of house fires, as they can ignite dry brush and spread to residential areas.

According to the Pew Research Center, July 4 and 5 see the highest number of emergency room admissions each year, with approximately 45,000 people seeking medical attention for injuries. This number far surpasses any other day of the year, highlighting the need for increased vigilance and precaution during these celebrations. The combination of fireworks, alcohol, and firearms contributes to this surge in injuries. Ensuring you have the proper protective gear can make the difference between a safe and enjoyable celebration and a trip to the emergency room.

Your eyes are particularly vulnerable to injury when handling fireworks. It is crucial to wear a pair of protective goggles. Goggles sold at DIY stores are generally sufficient, but ensure they fit well and are comfortable. Firework retailers often give away free goggles, but these should be inspected for quality and fit. Remember, regular spectacles do not provide adequate protection on their own and should not be relied upon in place of proper safety goggles.

Fireworks can be extremely loud, and repeated exposure to these sounds can damage your hearing. Disposable earplugs offer a basic level of protection and are a good choice for occasional use.

Last but certainly not least, protecting your hands is crucial when lighting fireworks, as there is always a risk of minor burns or other, more severe injuries. The type of gloves you wear will depend on the method you use to light the fireworks. If you need a lot of dexterity, consider thinner kitchen heat/cutting gloves, which provide a balance between protection and flexibility. For more heavy duty fireworks, thicker rigging gloves may be necessary. Always ensure your gloves allow you enough movement to handle lighters or blow torches effectively.

The Fourth of July is a day to celebrate our nation's independence and enjoy time with family and friends. However, it is also a day that sees a marked increase in accidents, injuries, and violence. By taking practical steps such as wearing a bulletproof vest, especially in areas where celebratory gunfire is more likely, individuals can significantly reduce their risk of injury. Remember, while the festivities are important, nothing is more valuable than your safety and well-being. Stay safe and have a happy Fourth of July!

To shop BulletSafe Bulletproof Vests, click here.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this blog does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author alone and do not reflect the opinions and views of BulletSafe or bulletsafe.com.

The possession of body armor by felons poses a significant danger to public safety and law enforcement. Body armor is designed to protect individuals from gunfire and other physical attacks, which makes it a valuable asset for those engaging in criminal activities. When felons, particularly those with violent backgrounds, have access to body armor, they gain a considerable tactical advantage over police officers and the public. This advantage can lead to more brazen and dangerous criminal behavior, as the felons may feel emboldened by their perceived invulnerability.

For law enforcement, the presence of body armor on felons complicates and escalates the risks associated with apprehending them. Police officers are trained to handle various threats, but when a suspect is wearing body armor, standard procedures and tactics can become less effective. For instance, in a shootout or armed confrontation, body armor can render many of the officers' defensive measures ineffective, putting their lives in greater jeopardy. This not only increases the risk to the officers themselves but also to innocent bystanders who might be caught in the crossfire. The added difficulty in neutralizing an armed and protected felon can lead to longer, more dangerous standoffs, heightening the potential for collateral damage.

The restriction on felons possessing body armor is not a violation of the Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment does not guarantee unrestricted access to all forms of protective equipment, especially for those who have been convicted of serious crimes. Courts have upheld various regulations that restrict certain individuals, such as convicted felons, from accessing weapons and related gear. These restrictions are considered reasonable measures to ensure public safety and order. The rationale is that individuals who have demonstrated a propensity for violence and disregard for the law pose a heightened threat if they have access to body armor.

Where does it say that in the law?

Amendment 670 is a legal change to Chapter Two, Part K, Subpart 2 of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual that introduces a new rule about body armor for people who have been convicted of violent felonies. It explains how such cases should be handled in court, including how serious the offense is and what extra penalties might apply.

Key Points of the Amendment

1. Who Does This Affect?
• This law applies to people who have been convicted of violent crimes, either at the federal or state level. If you've been convicted of a felony (a serious crime punishable by more than a year in prison), you cannot possess, purchase, or own body armor.
2. Base Offense Level: 10
• When a violent felon is caught with body armor, the starting point for determining their punishment is called the "base offense level," which is set at 10. This level helps decide how severe the punishment should be.
3. Increased Penalty for Using Body Armor in Another Crime
• If the person uses the body armor while committing another felony (another serious crime), their offense level increases by 4 points, making the punishment more severe.

Important Terms Explained

• Defendant: This term refers to the person who is being charged with the crime. In this amendment, it specifically means the individual whose actions are being judged, including anything they actively helped with.
• Felony Offense: This means any serious crime that could lead to more than a year in prison, regardless of whether the person was actually charged or convicted.
• Used: This means the body armor was actively employed to protect against gunfire or used for bartering. Simply having the armor in a car trunk, for example, doesn't count as "used."

Commentary and Notes

• Additional Guidance: The amendment includes extra notes to clarify how to apply these rules, like how to handle cases where the body armor was used in connection with another felony.
• No Double Penalty: If the body armor was used in another felony, and that felony itself has a rule about using body armor, you don’t get penalized twice for the same thing.

Why Was This Amendment Made?

The amendment was necessary because a new law (18 U.S.C. § 931) was created to specifically address violent felons possessing body armor. Before this amendment, there wasn't a clear guideline for how to handle these cases.

Penalties Under the New Law

• Statutory Maximum: The maximum prison term for possessing body armor as a violent felon is three years.
• Base Offense Level: A base offense level of 10 is set for this crime, lower than some gun-related crimes, reflecting its relative seriousness.
• Increased Punishment for Additional Crimes: If the body armor is used in another felony, the offense level goes up by 4 points, making the sentence potentially harsher.

Effective Date

• The amendment took effect on November 1, 2004.

Amendment 670 makes it clear that violent felons are prohibited from possessing, purchasing, or owning body armor. It sets specific rules for how these cases should be handled, including extra penalties if the armor is used in other crimes. This ensures that the legal system has a structured approach to dealing with these offenses.

BulletSafe, renowned for its high-quality body armor, has unveiled its latest innovation, the VP4 bulletproof vest. This new model surpasses its predecessor, the VP3, in every aspect, offering enhanced protection, comfort, and adaptability.

Uncompromising Protection

The VP4 retains the robust protection that BulletSafe is known for. Like the VP3, it is NIJ certified for Level IIIA, providing reliable defense against most small rimfire calibers up to large centerfire pistol ammunition, from .22LR up to .44 Magnum. This level of protection ensures that the wearer is safeguarded against a wide range of common threats.

Enhanced Fit and Comfort

One of the standout features of the VP4 is its improved fit and comfort. The vest comes with large hook and loop adjustment straps in two interchangeable sizes, allowing it to accommodate a broader range of body types comfortably. The expanded hook and loop surface area provides greater flexibility to adjust the fit, ensuring that users can tighten or loosen the vest as needed for optimal comfort and security.

Additionally, the VP4 boasts a lower profile for its hook and loop surfaces compared to the VP3, resulting in a sleeker and more streamlined appearance. This design enhancement not only improves the vest's aesthetic appeal but also reduces bulk, making it more comfortable to wear under clothing.

Advanced Mobility and Practicality

The VP4 body armor introduces a modified shooter’s cut, a significant upgrade from the VP3, designed to offer increased freedom of movement. This new cut allows users to move more naturally and comfortably, making the VP4 an ideal choice for law enforcement officers, security personnel, and anyone needing a bulletproof vest that doesn't hinder mobility.

Moreover, the inclusion of elastic denim at the bottom of the vest helps support the weight of ballistic plates, which are often too heavy for standard soft armor vests. The elastic denim also minimizes chafing from duty belts or pistol belts made of hard materials or leather, enhancing overall comfort during extended wear.

Versatility for Enhanced Protection

The VP3 body armor was celebrated for its versatility, with pockets designed to hold Level IV plates capable of stopping rifle rounds up to .30-06. The VP4 continues this tradition but with improved fitment, thanks to its new shooter’s cut. This feature ensures that the plates fit better and move with the wearer, offering enhanced protection without sacrificing mobility.

Made in the USA

BulletSafe takes pride in manufacturing its armor in the United States, ensuring the highest standards of quality and reliability. The VP4 is no exception, embodying the craftsmanship and attention to detail that BulletSafe customers have come to expect.

In summary, the BulletSafe VP4 bulletproof vest represents a significant advancement over the VP3. With its superior fit, enhanced comfort, increased mobility, and uncompromising protection, the VP4 is an excellent choice for anyone seeking reliable and versatile body armor. Whether you are in law enforcement, security, or simply looking for personal protection, the VP4 delivers outstanding performance to meet your needs.

On the morning of February 28, 1997, Los Angeles witnessed one of the most harrowing and transformative events in modern law enforcement history. Larry Phillips Jr. and Emil Mătăsăreanu, after meticulously planning and preparing for months, stormed the Bank of America branch at 6600 Laurel Canyon Boulevard in North Hollywood. What ensued was a 44-minute gun battle that would change police tactics, equipment, and training forever.

Phillips and Mătăsăreanu were not your average bank robbers. They entered the bank armed with a cache of rifles, including illegally modified full-automatic weapons, and clad in homemade body armor, effectively preparing them for an extended firefight with the police.

The Outgunned Officers

At that time, most police officers were equipped with 9mm or .38 Special pistols, with some carrying 12-gauge shotguns. These weapons proved woefully ineffective. Additionally, the officers found themselves outmatched not just in firepower but also in range, as their handguns and shotguns were insufficient for longer-distance engagements. Approximately 10 to 15 minutes into the shootout, an officer was heard on the LAPD police frequency warning others not to stop the getaway vehicle because "they've got automatic weapons, there's nothing we have that can stop them."

The robbers’ use of automatic weapons and their heavy armor left the police pinned down, unable to effectively counter the threat. In a desperate move, several officers commandeered AR-15-style rifles from a nearby gun store to stand a fighting chance against the assailants.

The Turning Point

As the shootout raged on, LA SWAT units armed with AR-15s arrived on the scene. Despite their advanced training and equipment, the SWAT officers faced a formidable challenge. Phillips and Mătăsăreanu's body armor covered all vital areas except their heads, and a steel plate in Mătăsăreanu's chest armor even protected him against 5.56x45mm rounds from the SWAT operators’ rifles.

Ultimately, Phillips succumbed to a self-inflicted gunshot wound followed by multiple shots from responding officers, after which police cuffed and secured his body, while Mătăsăreanu died from excessive blood loss after being shot 29 times in his unprotected legs. Thankfully, no one apart from the gunmen were killed.

The Aftermath and Its Impact

The North Hollywood Shootout exposed critical vulnerabilities in police preparedness and equipment. Before the shootout, only specialized SWAT units were typically armed with semi-automatic weapons like AR-15s. The encounter demonstrated that all officers needed access to more powerful firearms to effectively respond to such high-intensity situations.

In the wake of the shootout, police departments nationwide overhauled their armament policies. Many departments began equipping all officers with AR-15s, ensuring they could respond adequately to similar threats. Additionally, bulletproof vests became standard issue for officers, enhancing their protection during confrontations.

Today, the advancements in police body armor are significant. Departments across the country now utilize vests like those made by BulletSafe, which offer superior protection compared to the gear available in the 1990s. These modern vests are constructed from a blend of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and aramid fibers, providing durable and effective protection that far exceeds the homemade armor worn by Phillips and Mătăsăreanu.

Legacy of the Shootout

The North Hollywood Shootout stands as a stark reminder of the dangers law enforcement officers face and the need for continual advancement in their equipment and training. It sparked a nationwide re-evaluation of police preparedness, leading to significant improvements that have undoubtedly saved lives in subsequent years.

This pivotal moment in law enforcement history underscores the importance of being ready for the unexpected. The lessons learned from that day continue to shape policing strategies and ensure that officers are better equipped to protect themselves and the communities they serve.

A few months ago, my cousin contacted me about wanting to buy a bulletproof vest for the first time. He wanted, in his own words, to be “armored like Batman” so he would be completely protected from gun and knife fire. In other words, he wanted to be covered in as much bulletproof material as humanly possible.

To save him from future embarrassment and buyer’s remorse, I told him in no uncertain terms that his idea was stupid. For someone armored head to toe like the Juggernaut, the simple act of walking from one room to another is a light cardio workout. Running will be slower, and changing positions from prone to kneeling to standing again would be another workout by itself.

This goes without mentioning the hassle of putting on such a cumbersome piece of equipment in the dead of the night while your adversaries are bearing down on you. In a worst-case scenario, you’d have to fight hand-to-hand with someone, and a bulky heavy vest works against you in such a scenario.

An approximation of my cousin's ideal home-defense loadout. There are more practical options.

In a practical situation, one would want the lightest, least obstructive armor one could get. The military knows this, and the Department of Defense has been trying to tackle the problem for decades. Since the military introduced true bulletproof armor after phasing out the light (but not bulletproof) PASGT armor system, designers and engineers have grappled with the challenge of striking the right balance between protection and mobility for American soldiers.

The Interceptor Body Armor (IBA), introduced in the early 2000s, was an initial attempt at providing comprehensive upper body protection to the individual infantryman. However, it quickly became apparent that the IBA was simply too heavy and limited a soldier’s movement too much to be as combat effective as the military wanted to be. In response to these issues, in 2008, the Improved Outer Tactical Vest (IOTV) was introduced as its successor.

An American officer wearing the IOTV.

The IOTV, while an improvement, still faced criticism for the same problems of being heavy and cumbersome. Special Operations units took a different route, completely abandoning the IOTV in favor of lighter plate carriers. Furthermore, deltoid and groin protectors were rarely used since they did relatively little to save a soldier from a direct hit. While they protected fairly well against shrapnel from explosives, these accessory panels do nothing against direct hits from enemy rifle fire. Most realized the extra padding was more hindrance than help. Recognizing the need for a more agile solution, the military is now phasing out the IOTV in favor of the Modular Scalable Vest (MSV). Weighing 25lbs fully loaded, this new armor system is 5lbs lighter than its predecessor, signaling a shift towards enhanced mobility for regular troops.

Beyond the military, civilians, including security personnel and citizens who regularly wear body armor, are also seeking lighter alternatives to traditional full armor kits. Anyone who walks around with armor all day wants the same two things: protection and mobility.

One armor kit that offers the best of both worlds is the Advanced Vest with Reinforced Lightweight Advanced (RLA) Armor from BulletSafe. Crafted with a focus on comfort and mobility, RLA armor is a lighter and more flexible alternative to its predecessors. Maintaining the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Certified IIIA protection, RLA armor is capable of defeating most pistol caliber threats, including formidable .44 magnum rounds.

Designed with the user in mind, this armor prioritizes comfort and flexibility without sacrificing protection. Its construction allows wearers to move freely, making it an ideal choice for individuals who need to be both protected and agile when they’re on the job.

The evolution of body armor reflects a fundamental shift in priorities from sheer protection to a balanced consideration of mobility and comfort. As military forces transition to lighter and more agile solutions like the MSV, civilians are also benefiting from innovations like BulletSafe’s RLA armor, which strikes a balance between protection and the freedom to move. As technology advances, the future of body armor looks promising, with continued emphasis on enhancing both safety and usability for users across various sectors.

To purchase the BulletSafe Advanced Vest with RLA Armor, click here